Skip to Main Content
chat loading...
lirbary homepage

Faculty Help: Generative AI Resource Guide: Plagiarism & Academic Integrity

Repository of info about impact of Generative AI on/in higher education. Focuses primarily on text generators.

Featured Articles

Relationship between the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes and plagiarism: the influence of student-related variables on cheating behavior
Interactive Learning Environments (Jan. 2025)
Does ChatGPT cause cheating? Is it a gateway to plagiarism?
Gain crucial insight from recent research exploring the complex relationship between ChatGPT usage for academic purposes and plagiarism. This study details how student-related factors influence cheating behaviors, offering valuable perspectives for educators, students, and academic institutions. 

A New Headache for Honest Students: Proving They Didn’t Use A.I.
New York Times (May 17, 2025)
Students are resorting to extreme measures to fend off accusations of cheating, including hourslong screen recordings of their homework sessions. 

What to do if you suspect unsanctioned use of Generative AI

  • Beforehand (“An ounce of prevention…”)
    • Develop a Generative AI use policy for your course syllabus and/or assignments
    • Draw students’ attention to that policy
    • Talk openly with students about Generative AI
    • Collect periodic writing samples from students to familiarize yourself with their writing style and voice
    • Require students to provide links to all sources, and randomly spot-check those links
      (Some Generative AI platforms can now provide real, legitimate links to so-called 'sources'; however, those links often do not match the generated 'source').
  • Tell the student why you believe they may have used Generative AI in a way they were not supposed to 
    • Do you see phrasing in their writing that clearly indicates a Generative AI platform wrote it? 
      • “I’m sorry but as a Large Language Model, I can’t….”
      • “Certainly! I’m happy to write that essay for you!” 
    • Is their writing style or vocabulary unexpectedly different than you’ve ever seen it?
    • Does their writing not address the question or prompt in a way you’d expect?
  • Engage the student in a conversation about their work
    • Are they able to engage and converse with you about their work or do they have trouble recalling key aspects? 
    • Ask the student to discuss both their thought and writing processes. Are they able to do this? 
    • Can they define terms/words that you believe may have been provided by Generative AI?  
    • Document this interaction. 
  • Please consider very carefully before...
    • Using AI detection software. 
    • Assuming that use of words like “delve,” “tapestry,” “landscape” etc automatically means the student used a Generative AI tool. Rather, compare the writing style with various student writing samples. 
  • Further action needed?

AI Humanizers - What are they?

The increasing use of Generative AI by students and faculty efforts to counter it have often been described as an arms race. One of the latest weapons in this race are AI 'humanizer' writing websites. 

What are they?
AI humanizer writing websites are tools designed to make AI-generated text sound more natural, human-like, and less detectable as machine-written. They work by taking content created by an AI (like ChatGPT or similar tools) and rewriting or editing it to:

  • Improve tone and flow
  • Add natural language patterns (e.g., contractions, idioms, variability)
  • Avoid common structures or phrasing that AI detectors flag

Some use rule-based methods (applying specific linguistic tweaks), while others use additional AI models trained to mimic human writing styles. These tools are often used to bypass AI detection tools or improve readability.

At the time of this writing (Spring 2025) some of the more popular AI humanizer websites are AIHumanizer, WriteHuman, Humanize AI and AI Undetect but there are hundreds out there.
 

To address suspected AI humanizer use in student essays:

Detection Strategies

  • Analyze writing patterns: Humanizers may correct grammar but leave overly uniform tone or lack authentic emotional shifts. Compare current work to past submissions for sudden style changes. 
  • Require process documentation: Ask for drafts, outlines, and AI prompts used. Verify consistency between stages. 
  • Check contextual depth: Humanized text often remains superficial or misses assignment-specific details (e.g., personal observations, niche citations).

Conversation Approaches

  • Ask open-ended questions: “Walk me through your research process” or “How did you develop this argument?” Inability to discuss specifics may indicate AI use.
  • Focus on learning: Frame violations as growth opportunities. Discuss time management, citation norms, and the value of original thought.

Policy Adjustments

  • Explicitly ban humanizers in syllabi and define consequences.
  • Assign AI-proof tasks: Incorporate real-world observations, class discussions, or reflective elements.

Tools and Workflow

  • Combine AI detectors (e.g., GPTZero) with plagiarism checkers, as humanizers often paraphrase.
  • Use version history tracking in tools like Google Docs to monitor edits.

It's time to rethink plagiarism and cheating

Click image to enlarge

6 Tenets of Plagiarism: Writing in the Age of AI

Click image to enlarge

Plagiarism & Academic Integrity

Looking for advice and tips on Generative AI's impact on plagiarism and academic integrity? Each of these links is customized to take you to highly focused and relevant content exclusively from that website or domain. 


ALSO...

Click here to see what articles the SFCC Library databases have on the topic of generative AI and academic integrity.

Click here to see what videos are out there on YouTube on the topic of generative AI and academic integrity. 

chat loading...